The sinking ship
Apparently Maryland schools now think that Maryland children do not need to learn that the first Thanksgiving involved God. That the Pilgrims and Native Americans partied together is noteworthy, but that the first thanks-givers had a specific reason for and object of their gratitude is too inconvenient of a fact to transmit to young minds.
"We teach about Thanksgiving from a purely historical perspective, not from a religious perspective," said Charles Ridgell, St. Mary's County Public Schools curriculum and instruction director.
The ironic aspect is that in the desire of Maryland's educators to uphold the sacred dichotomy between "objective" fact and "subjective" values, they've allowed their own beliefs to override the facts. In this case, the commitment to a specific form of religious toleration now compels them to overlook historical reality. After all, if one of the goals of history is to understand the forces and motivations behind what people did, then understanding that the pilgrim settlers, for better or for worse, saw a divine hand behind their preservation seems as if it would be an important thing to know. To omit that is nothing more than a value judgment.
Still, I'm having a hard time working myself up about this. Public education has always had some sort of religious foundation to it, consisting of both a belief about God (namely, that if he exists, he's largely irrelevant to our understanding about life) and a set of beliefs about the way we should live (in this case, the exaltation of the virtues of toleration and pluralism above the virtue of historical knowledge). This is simply the logical outworking of that conception. If you're upset that your kids might be imbibing religious belief antithetical to your own, there are other options.
November 23, 2004 01:18 PMI guess what gets me going about this is the fact that the liberal masses are continually crying out for "separation of religion from state" - and what is not recognized is that the secular humanist agenda and worldview that is being promoted in public schools is exactly that - a religion - being foisted on unsuspecting people. Now for me and my house, this is irrelevant - we're schooling at home - but for many people ignorant of the true state of schools, this is a danger.
I find it amusing that the phrase that's usually used, "Separation of Church and State" is in fact quite accurate... people really want THE CHURCH, i.e. Christianity, to have no influence in public life at all. Of course humanists, homosexuals, atheists, wiccans, muslims, etc - these are just fine, and are voices that should be heard.
Pondered by Todd Pedlar at November 23, 2004 03:05 PMIn order to correct this, Sean and Frank on the WCBM morning show asked how many times the Almighty was mentioned in George Washington's Thanksgiving proclamation of 1789. (at http://www.night.net/thanksgiving/kwash-11.html ). The answer was 15. It includes references such as "He" "Him" "His" and "Lord" in addition to "God Almighty". I'm not sure it's 15 times, but historically George Washington imbued it with religious (though non-sectarian) meaning.
Pondered by David Gerstman at November 23, 2004 04:55 PMthey usually also don't mention that after the first thanksgiving indians died from diseases like smallpox or were murdered by pilgrims or forced to become slaves.
Pondered by betsy at November 23, 2004 04:57 PMPublic education has its roots in Christianity, in the idea that we're all born equal, that we're all equal in God's eyes, and therefor all (regardless of race, gender, creed) have the right to a (public) education. It's already a Christian mission, really, it's just not overt. If you want overt Christianity in your kid's education, you can send them to a (private) religious school.
Why do the loudly professing Christians always sound the least Christian in public discourse?
Pondered by Romarkin at November 25, 2004 12:02 AMRomarkin (changing from Mad Raunter?) -
Yes, public education, at least in terms of being open to all, has been influenced by Christianity. And, if I remember correctly, much of the emphasis on being non-sectarian actually came about because of Protestant fears of Catholic encroachment.
What I specifically had in mind, though, was the influence of thinkers such as John Dewey, who saw very little need for Christianity, on state-run education. The MD school administration's intentional omission of even the mention of Christianity when teaching history is simply a logical extension of what Dewey & company believed. Perhaps I should have been clearer on that.
Pondered by maphet at November 26, 2004 10:57 AMNever heard of John Dewey, so I read a little blurb of his bio as well as his Pedagogic Creed. In it, he argues for school as a social institution that encourages intellectual development of the student as a member of a social group, drawing from the groups collective resources and contributing his thoughts back to that group.
His creed would seem to imply that moral values are the product of reflection and social interaction by the individual rather than the acceptance of approved doctrine by any particular philosophy or religion. This does not mean that there is little need for Christianity, but merely that the student should decide for himself his beliefs through socializing and thinking.
MD's omission then isn't a logical extension of Dewey's philosophy. What the MD schools have done is to avoid flaming by non-centrist liberals.
Pondered by argyle at December 2, 2004 10:47 AMBut his creed that "moral values are the product of reflection by the individual rather than the acceptance of approved doctrine by any particular philosophy or religion" is in itself a doctrine of a particular philosophy and religion. In Dewey's case (see his 'A Common Faith' for further exposition), the epistemological and ethical foundations for life are grounded in the individual as he/she responds to sociological circumstances. This is not a neutral system, it is a system that is competing with Christianity (or any other system that grounds ethics outside the individual) in that it is a set of claims about how we are to live and view the world.
Dewey's last statement in his creed is that "the teacher always is the prophet of the true God and the usherer in of the true kingdom of God." By "true God" and "true kingdom of God," he is emphatically not referring to the God of Christianity. Thus his beliefs are exclusive of Christianity and thus the MD school's ommission of the Christian roots of Thanksgiving are consistent with Dewey.
Pondered by maphet at December 2, 2004 11:38 AM